In 2008 R2 you've to do like this using ROW_NUMBER function. U-SQL makes many of the keywords optional to minimize the amount of typing required. Offset clause skips all rows specified in table while Fetch clause returns first two rows after offset clause. OFFSET is being used to skip the first 10 rows and FETCH is then used to display the next 5. The OFFSET/FETCH clause is the ANSI SQL-conformant way to specify getting the first number of rows. SELECT orderid, orderdate, custid, filler FROM dbo.Orders ORDER BY orderdate DESC, orderid DESC OFFSET 50 ROWS FETCH NEXT 10 ROWS ONLY; Where is the problem and how can I find the probl It's joining on two temp tables (#A … OFFSET and FETCH in Action. In the fetch clause, FIRST and NEXT can be used according to user’s requirements. However, when you implement/use paging in your script, you face a big challenge, that is, to find the total number of records in that particular … The start of the window is determined by OFFSET and the height by FETCH. For me the use of OFFSET and FETCH together was slow, so I used a combination of TOP and OFFSET like this (which was faster): ... With "OFFSET and FETCH", But with this "ORDER BY" is mandatory. The earlier pages return results very fast but later ones are extremely slow and creating a bottleneck in our system. The SAN data volume has a throughput capacity of 400MB/sec; however my query is still running slow and it is waiting on I/O (PAGEIOLATCH_SH). In the following diagram you can see OFFSET and FETCH at work. 3. I have written quite a detailed article earlier about it and implemented it in my most of the solutions wherever required. I have a SQL Server query that is performing poorly when retrieving data via pagination using offset/fetch. – the CTE (WITH pg AS)… makes absolut no sense in this case and will slow down the query – the CTE will lead to wrong results, since you get only the first x IDs and order them depending on the parameter. Emulate group by, order by, limit from mysql to ms sql 2000. The main issue here is with OFFSET large value.. offset 1000000 rows fetch next 1000 rows only. Windows Performance Monitor shows data volume speed of 4MB/sec. ... LIMIT style functionality in MS SQL Server 2005. OFFSet and Fetch works great,when the OFFSET value is small,see below example for more details. The resulting challenge is that it has to skip the rows from the previous pages. If the OFFSET x ROWS clause is not specified, it defaults to OFFSET 0 ROWS. But usually would like to have the first x Names in the list.-> get rid of the CTE and place the OFFSET / FETCH at the end of your query After implementing a pipelined top-N query to retrieve the first page efficiently, you will often also need another query to fetch the next pages. SELECT Id FROM dbo.Person WHERE CONTAINS(Name, '"John" AND "Smith"') ORDER BY Name OFFSET 0 rows FETCH NEXT 10 ROWS ONLY It takes more than 20 seconds to give me 10 results. Offset clause is mandatory to use while fetch is optional … OFFSET FETCH as suggested in earlier post is available only from SQL 2012 onwards. The combination of OFFSET and FETCH make it easy to retrieve a “sliding” window of rows. Paging became quite simpler & easy to script and manage by using OFFSET & FETCH NEXT keywords in SQL Server 2012 & above.